Skip to content

E-Discovery Hops from CivPro to CrimPro

March 18, 2008

E-Discovery Hops from CivPro to CrimPro

ediscoveryinfo, March 12, 2008

This article discusses an opinion given by U.S. Magistrate Judge John Facciola about electronically stored information (ESI). In response to the case of United States v. O’Keefe, Facciola discusses the lack of legal rules that dictate how ESI is handled during criminal cases, as opposed to civil cases.

According to Facciola, “It [would be] foolish to disregard [the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] merely because this is a criminal case, particularly where, as is the case here, it is far better to use these rules than to reinvent the wheel when the production of documents in criminal and civil cases raise the same problems.”

We agree with the Judge and believe that regardless whether a case is civil or criminal, electronic documents should be detected, preserved and presented all in the same fashion. In fact, we’ve heard from an increasing number of criminal and white collar defense attorneys who are thinking about ESI in terms of evidence capture and chain of custody protection.

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: